2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1978 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 732 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1300. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: