2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1323 kg more than 1980 TVR 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1980 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1980 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Dodge | TVR |
Model | Charger | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |