2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1982 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (67 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 736 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1982 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Charger | Gemini |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2410 mm |