2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1982 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1982 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Cherry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1982 Nissan Cherry has manual transmission. 1982 Nissan Cherry will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1982 Nissan Cherry | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Charger | Cherry |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 368 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2400 mm |