2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Charger | Mum 500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 500 cc |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
