2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 138 kg more than 2009 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Charger | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2730 mm |
