2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 426 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (339 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Charger | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2830 mm |
