2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 483 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (191 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Charger | Equator |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2701 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3260 mm |
