2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 790 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Charger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 368 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |