2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 322 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Dodge | Lancia |
Model | Charger | Nea |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2590 mm |