2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Saturn SC would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2001 Saturn SC. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Saturn SC.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 2001 Saturn SC | |
| Make | Dodge | Saturn |
| Model | Charger | SC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 125 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
