2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Charger. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 108 kg more than 2009 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (339 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Charger | X400 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 69 L |
