2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2003 Studebaker Avanti
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Studebaker Avanti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Studebaker Avanti would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Studebaker Avanti is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Studebaker Avanti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2003 Studebaker Avanti has manual transmission. 2003 Studebaker Avanti will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2003 Studebaker Avanti | |
Make | Dodge | Studebaker |
Model | Charger | Avanti |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |