2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1252 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Westfield |
| Model | Charger | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2320 mm |
