2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (368 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (536 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Dodge | Proton |
Model | Charger | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 368 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2610 mm |