2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover City. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Charger | City |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2410 mm |