2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2006 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: