2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2008 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2008 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Dodge | Daewoo |
Model | Charger | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |