2009 Dodge Charger vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Charger would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Charger. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 252 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Charger | Evora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |