2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Dakota | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2710 mm |
