2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1327 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Dakota | Master RR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |