2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 429 kg more than 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Dakota | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 2108 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 81 L |