2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1962 Seat 1400
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1962 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 1400. (88 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 1962 Seat 1400 | |
Make | Dodge | Seat |
Model | Dakota | 1400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2660 mm |