2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Dakota | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.7 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 54 L |