2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | EK |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
