2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 211 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Dakota 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Dodge Oldsmobile
Model Dakota Cutlass
Year Released 2009 1977
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 3790 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 211 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1691 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]