2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1980 Volkswagen Golf

To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Dakota 1980 Volkswagen Golf
Make Dodge Volkswagen
Model Dakota Golf
Year Released 2009 1980
Body Type Pickup Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 1457 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 207 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]