2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 208 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang.

Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Dakota. 2009 Dodge Dakota has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Dakota will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Dakota 1982 Ford Mustang
Make Dodge Ford
Model Dakota Mustang
Year Released 2009 1982
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 211 HP 225 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 407 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.9 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 9.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1691 kg 1483 kg
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2560 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]