2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1987 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Astra would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1987 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Astra.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 1987 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | Astra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2420 mm |
