2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 1991 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1991 Mini MK VI. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mini MK VI. (116 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 1991 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Dodge | Mini |
| Model | Dakota | MK VI |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2040 mm |
