2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (161 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2000 Mazda MX-5 Miata | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | MX-5 Miata |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 58 L |