2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Dakota | El Grand |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1950 mm |
