2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2001 Ford Think
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Think. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Think would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Think, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Think. (183 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Think. 2001 Ford Think has automatic transmission and 2009 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Think will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2001 Ford Think | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | Think |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2730 mm |