2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |