2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2002 MG TF | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Dakota | TF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 89.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |