2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1067 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Dakota | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Dakota | F1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 45 L |
