2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 BMW X6

To start off, 2011 BMW X6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X6 (555 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW X6 weights approximately 724 kg more than 2009 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW X6 (677 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Dakota 2011 BMW X6
Make Dodge BMW
Model Dakota X6
Year Released 2009 2011
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 4400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 211 HP 555 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 677 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1691 kg 2415 kg
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1984 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1684 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2934 mm
Fuel Consumption 13.1 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 16.8 L/100km 19.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 85 L