2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Dakota would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Dodge | Fisker |
Model | Dakota | Karma |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 36 L |