2009 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,691 cc, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo weights approximately 79 kg more than 2009 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo (510 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
Make | Dodge | Maserati |
Model | Dakota | Gran Turismo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 4691 cc |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4933 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2056 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1343 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2942 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 86 L |