2009 Dodge Durango vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Dodge Durango is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Durango (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Durango weights approximately 875 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Durango (380 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Durango | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Durango | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2540 mm |