2009 Dodge Durango vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Dodge Durango is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Durango (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 692 kg more than 2009 Dodge Durango.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Durango (515 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Durango | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Durango | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5652 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 2383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 132 L |
