2009 Dodge Nitro vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 Dodge Nitro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Nitro. (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Nitro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 184 kg more than 2009 Dodge Nitro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Nitro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Nitro | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Nitro | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2778 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |