2009 Dodge Nitro vs. 1962 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2009 Dodge Nitro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Nitro. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Nitro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Nitro weights approximately 64 kg more than 1962 Jaguar MK X.
Because 2009 Dodge Nitro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Nitro. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Nitro.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Nitro | 1962 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Nitro | MK X |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1896 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 90 L |