2009 Dodge Nitro vs. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2009 Dodge Nitro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 2,778 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Nitro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Nitro (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Nitro weights approximately 41 kg more than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Nitro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Nitro (410 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Nitro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. 2009 Dodge Nitro has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Grand Scenic has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Nitro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Nitro | 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Nitro | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2778 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
