2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1951 Holden FX
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1951 Holden FX | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | FX |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |