2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Ram. (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1961 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Ram | MK X |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 90 L |