2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Ford Popular
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (350 HP @ 3013 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Ram weights approximately 632 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1962 Ford Popular | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Popular |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6690 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 3013 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |