2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 345 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 184 kg more than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 40 L |