2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant

To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.

Because 2009 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Ram 1963 Plymouth Valiant
Make Dodge Plymouth
Model Ram Valiant
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5654 cc 2789 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 390 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3560 mm 2700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]