2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Porsche 356
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Porsche 356. (95 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1963 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Dodge | Porsche |
Model | Ram | 356 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |